Jacob Rees-mogg was urged today to fund a new charity to back up his assertion that life begins at conception, and no matter how horrific the circumstances of conception, the woman should suffer because Jacob’s idea of a sky daddy wants it.
The proposed name for the charity is ‘The Rees-mogg Foundation for mothers who conceive via incest’.
It’s felt the name best explains what the member of parliament thinks on the subject of right to choose, or no right to choose, depending on which religious dogma you adhere to, in spite of all scientific evidence which argues for a more progressive approach. Oh, and basic human decency for people who’ve already developed an advanced brain and the ability to suffer deeply, such as women who conceived against their will.
The Rochdale Herald spoke to a member of the committee that issued the call to Rees-mogg to gain further insight into their motivation.
“Some people think a woman’s right to decide what happens with her body should take privilege, up to a legally defined point in the progression of a pregnancy where exhaustive scientific enquiry suggests is appropriate. Some people believe that it doesn’t matter if, for example, a woman conceives through horrors that someone like Jacob is never going to experience, it’s tough luck, God gave you a uterus for a reason and even if you’re emotionally destroyed you better bloody well get on and deliver that pup or you’re a sinner who deserves even more suffering. For eternity even.”
What the MP thinks of the call, even though it is a perfectly coherent way to balance out his zero empathy for women who maybe suffering deep psychological torment as a result of two cells joining together against their wishes, is anyone’s guess. But it’s sure to have his supporters in a foaming mouth frenzy at the thought of repetitional damage to their chosen icon of the 19th century.
It’s thought likely though that he’s busy phoning Boris to goad him about how he’s now replaced him as most loved caricature of a conservative human being.
